[ad_1]
Prince Harry‘s legal battle against the British government over the removal of his taxpayer-funded protection took a revealing turn in the High Court. The Duke of Sussex, who left the UK in 2020 with Meghan Markle, argued that their departure was not a “choice” but a result of feeling “forced” due to security concerns. In a written statement read by his lawyer, Harry expressed his sadness and emphasized the importance of the UK as his home and a central part of his children’s heritage.
The ongoing three-day hearing has shed light on Harry’s perspective, challenging the government’s decision to alter his security arrangements post-exit. He contends that the move was “unlawful and unfair,” given his royal status and the historical context of Princess Diana‘s tragic death in 1997.
Harry’s legal team asserted that the decision was irrational, treating him “less favorably” and lacking a proper risk analysis. The government, represented by James Eadie, argued that the change was justified since Harry is no longer a full-time working royal and mostly resides abroad. The Home Office maintains that a bespoke security arrangement has been provided.
The Duke’s concerns extend to the safety of his family, particularly Archie and Lilibet, whenever they visit the UK. He stated, “I cannot put my wife in danger like that, and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too.” The legal battle comes amid claims that the current security measures are insufficient for their protection.
The judge, who has retired to consider the arguments, will deliver a judgment in the coming weeks. This case is one of several involving Prince Harry at the High Court, reflecting the ongoing complexities surrounding his life outside the royal family and the sensitive issue of security arrangements.
(with inputs from AFP)
The ongoing three-day hearing has shed light on Harry’s perspective, challenging the government’s decision to alter his security arrangements post-exit. He contends that the move was “unlawful and unfair,” given his royal status and the historical context of Princess Diana‘s tragic death in 1997.
Harry’s legal team asserted that the decision was irrational, treating him “less favorably” and lacking a proper risk analysis. The government, represented by James Eadie, argued that the change was justified since Harry is no longer a full-time working royal and mostly resides abroad. The Home Office maintains that a bespoke security arrangement has been provided.
The Duke’s concerns extend to the safety of his family, particularly Archie and Lilibet, whenever they visit the UK. He stated, “I cannot put my wife in danger like that, and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too.” The legal battle comes amid claims that the current security measures are insufficient for their protection.
The judge, who has retired to consider the arguments, will deliver a judgment in the coming weeks. This case is one of several involving Prince Harry at the High Court, reflecting the ongoing complexities surrounding his life outside the royal family and the sensitive issue of security arrangements.
(with inputs from AFP)
#Harry #Prince #Harry #reveals #security #fears #Meghan #forced #exit
